Diocletian and Constantine were famous as the people who completely reformed the military system and created a new system of government, which gave new life to the late roman empire.
I am not a 100% sure, but I think it would be the speaker of the house. Hope this helps
Joseph Stalin was ( c ) a cruel leader of the Soviet Union. After Lenin´s death Stalin took over as leader of the Soviet Union. He believed that he should change the country from agricultural to industrialized, building factories all over the Soviet Union. He is known for his cruelty. He order several "purges" in which people he thought were against him would be killed or sent to slave labour camps.
D. He was a doctor who probed the workings of the conscious and unconscious mind.
He's the one associated with terms such as "penis envy," and the interpretation of dreams in such a way that the dreamer has some sort of sexual attraction to someone or something.
Answer: “Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
