<span>In "an occurrence at owl creek bridge," the author uses symbolism to identify the ticking of the man's watch as time slows and he becomes more aware of his surroundings. The watch is the major symbol for the protagonist's life, because</span><span> when watch tick and ''time'' runs out it represents last heart beats of the character.</span>
The Zimbardo experiment provides insight into Abu Ghraib prison scandal just as the Milgram experiment provides insight into My Lai massacre.+
<h3>
What is The Zimbardo Experiment?</h3>
In an effort to establish the validity of crowd theory, a type of group lunacy also known as deindividuation, psychologist Philip Zimbardo made a claim in 1971. He enlisted volunteers for an experiment and transformed a Stanford basement into a fake prison. Six would be on call, nine would be guards, and nine would be inmates. He took on the role of superintendent.
<h3>
What is The Milgram Experiment?</h3>
- The Milgram experiment sought to determine how far people would go to comply with authority figures' commands.
- An researcher instructed the participants to shock a different person with electric shocks that got stronger. The participants were unaware that the shocks were phony and that the person receiving them was an actor.
- Even though the person being shocked shouted in pain, the majority of volunteers still followed instructions.
<h3>
What is Milgram’s Legacy?</h3>
According to Milgram's interpretation of his studies, regular individuals are capable of doing the inconceivable under specific conditions. Although these applications are by no means commonly recognized or agreed upon, his study has been used to explain tragedies like the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide.
<h3>
What is Stanford prison experiment?</h3>
The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) was created to investigate how participants' responses and behaviors changed throughout the course of a two-week simulation of a prison environment. Philip Zimbardo, a psychology professor at Stanford University, oversaw the research team that conducted the study in the summer of 1971.
Learn more about Stanford prison experiment:
brainly.com/question/5014785
#SPJ4
The type of executive branch nominations, including those for Cabinet members, ambassadors, and White House personnel, will determine if there will be a clash with the Senate.
<h3>
Potential for Conflict with Senate</h3>
- Although Senate confirmation serves as a crucial check on the president's appointment authority, life-tenured judicial nominations have the capacity to have a lasting impact.
- The president's policy ambitions and executive actions frequently clash with the goals of Congress.
- With life-tenured judicial appointments, such as Supreme Court justices, the stakes are extremely high because the president has the chance to continue to have influence even after taking office. In contrast, White House staff posts are frequently more simpler to fill and do not require Senate confirmation.
- To accomplish policy objectives, the president uses executive orders and policy initiatives, both of which have the potential to escalate tensions with Congress. Because presidential orders can be used to make laws without the consent or input of Congress.
To know more about Conflict with Senate refer to:
brainly.com/question/15937320
#SPJ4
