Answer:
Similarities
1. Both documents advocated for the rights and liberty of the citizens.
2. Both documents prevented autocratic rule by ensuring the proper representation of the people.
Differences
1. The English Bill of Rights was borne out of political tensions while the US Bill of Rights was an amendment to the constitution.
2. They both differed in content. The English Bill of Rights contained information on the rights of citizens, reasons while the then Monarchs were rightful successors to the throne, and details of the ills committed by King James. The US Bill of Rights simply amended the constitution.
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights was signed into law in the year 1689 by William III and Mary II in response to the political and religious tensions happening at the time. This Bill of Rights gave powers to the Parliament and made them a source that must be consulted before critical decisions were made by the Monarchs. It also outlined the rights of citizens.
The US Bill of Rights received its blueprint from the English Bill of Rights. It was established in 1789 as 12 amendments to the constitution. It outlined the rights of the United States citizens, one of which was the Freedom of Speech.
This excerpt from the "los Angeles Sunday Times" (June 1899) might reflect <span>society’s discomfort with women’s emerging independence in 1899 (option A). It is suggested that the author of the book (Kate Chopin) wrote an "</span>unhealthy introspective and morbid in feeling as that sort of woman must inevitably be".
It means that he didn't talk to him or contact him much and weren't in a good father-son relationship
Answer:
The red badge of courage is a bloody wound that symbolizes bravery. When Henry walks with the wounded soldiers, he envies them their wounds—their bloodied badges of courage.
