WILL MARK BRAINLIEST !!! Who and what was affected by the Boston massacre?

History

1 answer:

Olenka [21]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The Boston Massacre had a major impact on relations between Britain and the American colonists. It further incensed colonists already weary of British rule and unfair taxation and roused them to fight for independence.

Explanation:

Found this on the internet and implemented some of my ideas as well, hopefully this helps.

You might be interested in

In the movie Miracle, following a tie in an exhibition game in Norway,

Paha777 [63]

The punishment for the players was to skate for a long time until players are exhausted.

"Miracle" is a movie about one famous male ice hockey team. This movie shows the struggles of the team and its coach to improve and win an important game against the Soviet Union.

In this movie, one of the most important moments is when the team fails to win an exhibition game in Norway and both the players and the coach are disappointed about it.

As a way to teach the players the importance of the team and their strength, the coach Herb Brooks decides to teach them an important lesson by making the players skate in the ice rink for a long time, even after the manager of the place turns on the lights.

Learn more about ice hockey in brainly.com/question/12935279

3 0

3 years ago

Which piece of furniture was not in the Holy Place?

statuscvo [17]

The Ark of Covenant was not in the Holy Place. It was in a separate part, behind a curtain since anyone who was to go in there and was not a priest would fall dead at the very minute they crossed the curtain.

8 0

3 years ago

Historically, evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that that vast majority of people who carry out acts of violence and/or genoc

Elina [12.6K]

TRUE because there is clearly something off. hope this helps :)

6 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP THIS IS DUE IN 10 MIN Caption this

Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

what do I do....just give it a title?

8 0

3 years ago

Summarize the mcdonald vs chicago case

Gala2k [10]

McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.

The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)

Have a good day, afternoon or night!

~Dreamer1331~

3 0

2 years ago