Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Answer:
A : It can be transferred to another party by endorsement.
Explanation:
Notes receivable:-
It is a kind of an account on balance sheet. If the life of this account is less than one year, it is usually under current assets section. It is a written promise which is used to receive the money on the fixed future date. The money involved in this accounts is both the principle and the interest.
It can be collected between any two parties. It is just a promise account and thus, does not eliminate any kind of allowance.
Hence, the correct statement is:-<u> A : It can be transferred to another party by endorsement.</u>
I think police brutality is a genuine issue in the US. The George Floyd case should’ve been handled better by the responding officers. The officer who inappropriately applied pressure to his neck should def face charges-
Answer:
because it's the most stably backed
Explanation:
The question that Jonathan is most likely trying to answer is" Is their any blood from the scene"?
<h3>What is Kastle-Meyer test?</h3>
The Kastle-Meyer test serves as a quick inexpensive test that can be utilized by a forensic expert to analyze if there is a blood in a scene.
It serves as a way to get evidence at a crime scene for the presence of blood.
Learn more about test at;
brainly.com/question/25567167
