Law of blood and law of soil!
People frequently harbor a variety of biases. Due to author bias, the writers of the two texts present the same event in different ways.
An author who is prejudiced is simply one who, in some manner, did not pay attention to all the facts, or evidence, or build a logical case to support his or her opinions.
In this context, bias is simply defined as when a point or remark demonstrates partiality or preference for a person, thing, etc. When you suspect a source may be prejudiced, when the author's viewpoint is strongly held or skewed, etc., you can usually tell.
Prejudice is a synonym for bias, which means that the arguments used to justify a position are frequently irrational. To assess an argument's worth and validity impartially, the reader must be able to identify any author's prejudice.
To learn more about author bias
brainly.com/question/24460194
#SPJ4
Answer:
Reaction formation
Explanation:
Reaction formation is a <em>defense mechanism in which the individual (Bryce in this case) exaggerates his emotions and impulses in the opposite way of what he perceives as the anxiety producing situation,</em> that's why he acts overly confident and daring when he's insecure in reality.
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
Answer:
judicial arrogance
Explanation:
Judicial arrogance refers to the irresponsible actions displayed by members of the justice department simply because they has the power to incorporate punishment to other citizens, making the citizens scared to oppose them event if they are making a violation.
This can be seen in judge Jones' actions. The most likely reason He constantly disrespect other people and wasting their time is because he know that there is very little chance he can get a consequences for his actions due to the position that the held as a judge.
Answer: Chocolate syrup
Explanation: Hope this helps :)