Which sentence is not an example of an effective thesis for an essay comparing two texts about hunger in the United States? Drou
in’s reliance on personal stories makes her argument less convincing than O'Neil’s. O’Neil combines testimony from social workers with economic statistics that date back to the 1920s to craft a more convincing argument than the one Drouin offers. Although both Drouin and O’Neil agree that hunger in the United States has generally declined since the beginning of the 20th century, Drouin’s use of personal stories makes a more interesting and more readable article. Drouin and O’Neil are both experienced scholars who write about poverty and hunger in the United States.
The correct answer is <span>Drouin and O’Neil are both experienced scholars who write about poverty and hunger in the United States.
This is a thesis because it can be examined and proved or disproved. Whether article is readable and personally enjoyable can't be tested because everyone has their own taste while comparing their arguments is not that relevant for a thesis but could be used in the body.</span>
It would be systematic because your not persuading them to do anything and assertive is about your personality. Systematic means to do something according to a plan or system.
