The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
The principle of government that is expressed in the excerpt from the Declaration of Independence is the principle of Republicanism.
The excerpt of the Declaration says: "In every stage of these Oppressions, We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury."
So the correct principle is Republicanism, the form of government in which the citizens are protected by the law. These citizens can participate and make decisions through their representatives because, in a Republic, politics is a public thing that involves the participation of citizens.
Answer:
I prefer a laissez-faire policy in working with Arabian countries. The US foreign policy in the late-1960s and 1970s was to intervene more than necessary in many events in Middle East to gain influences from the Soviet Unions. Unfortunately, the intervention leaded to the increase of Pan-Arabism.
The possible challenges of the do-nothing policy could be the protests of the pro-war and anti-communist persons.
Explanation:
Pan-Arabism is the increase of nationalism among Arab states on the purpose of unity creation against the growth of Western influence.
Hello there!
This is hard to go about but here’s what I got.
First off, Texas is a large state, this is important because the larger the state, the cheaper the land. If a business wants to develop they must buy and create, or buy property. Generally a larger state will have cheaper property due to the fact that there is way more property to go around. A second reason is the taxing. Texas taxes business at 1%. You might say, “wow that’s a lot, 1% of all the income!” But realistically it’s nothing compared to some states. California for example charges a tax rate of almost 9%! That’s 9 times the amount in Texas. Ultimately Texas is a good option because you have cheap land, and extremely low tax rates for business. Hopefully this help. Good luck!
Answer:
Question 8: The legislative branch may remove judges.
Question 9: The Supreme Court may judge executive acts unconstitutional.
Question 10: Congress may override a presidential Veto.
Explanation:
Question 8: The legislative branch may remove federal judges for misconduct, this is very rare, but is one of the main checks the legislative branch has over the judicial branch. The legislative branch does not appoint federal judges, that is a prerogative of the president, Congress can only confirm or veto the president's chosen judges.
Question 9: If any executive action or act is challenged in court, the judicial branch has the power to overturn it if it finds it unconstitutional. The judicial branch does not make the laws, it only interprets them and decides when they are unconstitutional.
Question 10: Congress can impeach the president, although it has happened only twice in history (Andrew Jackson and Nixon). The Supreme Court cannot impeach the president. The most common check used by congress is to override a presidential veto. While the legislative makes laws, it cannot decide on matters of unconstitutionality.
The Second World was the Eastern bloc in the Soviet sphere of influence, including the Soviet Union<span> </span>
