Answer:
colonial protestors led by a group called the Sons of Liberty called for a boycott. On October 20, the Congress adopted the Articles of Association, which stated that if the Intolerable Acts were not repealed by December 1, 1774, a boycott of British goods would begin in the colonies
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!
Gibbons v. Ogden,was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation. The case was argued by some of America's most admired and capable attorneys at the time. Exiled Irish patriot Thomas Addis Emmet and Thomas J. Oakley argued for Ogden, while U.S. Attorney General William Wirt and Daniel Webster argued for Gibbons.
President Harry.S Truman, warned by some of his advisors that Amy attempt to invade Japan would result in horrific American Casualties
No the court didn't thats why it resulted in the mishap.
It was the "c. Kellogg-Briand Pact" that discussed global disarmament and Pacific security (although it ultimately failed), and the reason why it could be argued that the Beer Hall Pusch was a successful event in Adolf Hitler’s political career was because "<span>d. It increased his popularity among both government and public sectors," since it was such a bold move. </span>