1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KengaRu [80]
3 years ago
10

Why did the sage Agastya turn Tataka into a demon? A. because she wanted to challenge Lord Rama B. because she wanted to control

the forest land C. because she terrorized Agastya and his disciples D. because Tataka’s husband threatened him
History
1 answer:
const2013 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

C. because she terrorized Agastya and his disciples

Explanation:

A. because she wanted to challenge Lord Rama❌

The account of Sri Rama and Tataka can be seen in the Hindu epic Ramayana. Tataka's father Suketu happens to be a Yaksha king who did Tapas to satisfy Lord Brahma in oder to get an offspring.

Suketu prayed for a son, but Brahma gave him a daughter, wondeful and great in physique. He named her Tataka. Hence, Tataka didn't challenge Lord Raja.

B. because she wanted to control the forest land❌

No! The aftermath of the curse of Agastya, turned Tataka to someone inhabiting the land of Malaja and Karusha in a forest land not far from the river Ganga, against the confluence of the river Sarayu.

C. because she terrorized Agastya and his disciples✔✔✔

The moment, Rishi Agastya cast a spell on Tataka's father Suketu to death. Tataka planned to perform huge revenge on the sage. She had the help of her son, Subahu. This bitter and angered Agastya placed a curse on Tataka to be without her beauty and wonderful physique, and turned her from a beautiful lady to a demonic creature with a with and cannibalistic attributes. The curse worked and turned Tataka to a man-killer with a distasteful and fierce appearance.

D. because Tataka’s husband threatened him❌

She got wedded to Sunda. She was blessed with two sons Maricha and Subahu and a daughter, Kaikasi.

Tataka and Sunda decided to marry off her daughter, Kaikasi to the Rishi Visravas so that her seed can be all-powerful. The account as not instance of Tataka’s husband threatening Visravas, therefore, it is wrong.

You might be interested in
President Eisenhower believed in the domino theory as applied to world politics, which is the belief that
Damm [24]
I believe the correct answer from the choices listed above is the third option. President Eisenhower believed in the domino theory as applied to world politics, which is the belief that  if one country becomes communist, others will follow.

Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
6 0
3 years ago
Will some answer that
Sliva [168]

Explanation:

it's called a claim you first stake it out and then send papers for it

4 0
3 years ago
During which eon did oxygen begin to build up the most in Earth’s atmosphere?
Akimi4 [234]
D is thehiendlw banshee
8 0
3 years ago
During the Nullification Crisis of 1832, South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union because it disagreed with a federal
nlexa [21]

Simple Answer: Tariffs

A tariff is a tax (in this case) on imports. The South, particularly South Carolina, objected strongly to the high rate of taxation on goods she desparately needed. The rates did seem a little high -- 62% on 92% of the goods coming into South Carolina (and other southern states). For example if South Carolina want to import 1000 dollars worth of shovels, she would have to pay an additional 620 dollars to do it.

The acts of 1828 and 1832 were thought by the South to be ruinous because not only would she be forced to pay much more for basic needs, she would not be able to sell her cotton to Great Britain because of the way the tax was imposed.

Thus a very strong case was built for disobedience to the 1828 and 1832 acts.   What made those two acts a pain was that North was determined to force unity on a South that had other economic problems during the 1830s (like drought). So the nullification process meant that something had to be done or South Carolina was threatening to go to war to protect her economy.

Thus the Tariff act of 1833 was introduced, and though you have not asked anything about that, I think you should note that Act was intended to unruffle South Carolina's feathers.  It was a grand compromise devised by Andrew Jackson's administration. It succeeded until 1842 when it's tenure was up. You can read all of this by reading more about the Nullification Crisis. Be sure and read about Jackson's comments on it.  

So this rather complex turn of events all really hinged on money and standard's of living. The vocabulary used was States Rights Vs Federal Rights. Put in very simple language: who has more rights, the one or the many? It took a civil war some 30 years later to resolve that question.

6 0
3 years ago
Anong kahalagahan ng kabihasnan sa mga kasalukuyang panahon?​
zmey [24]

Answer:

i dont get it

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which describes the Persian Empire
    13·1 answer
  • In the late 1900's, how did agriculture change in the south?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the atomic number of the atom shown?<br> A) 3 <br> B) 13 <br> C) 14 <br> D) 27
    11·2 answers
  • Who invaded constantinople in 1453? arab muslim armies ottoman turk armies roman catholic armies eastern orthodox armies?
    10·1 answer
  • The withdrawal of eleven Southern states from the Union in 1860 which precipitated the American Civil War
    6·1 answer
  • What were the effects of the women's rights movement of the middle to late 1800s?
    15·1 answer
  • Virginia has 11 people in the House and 2 in the Senate. How many electoral votes foes it have? Where is this addressed?
    7·1 answer
  • Federalists favored a
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the main cause of the Mexican-America war?
    7·2 answers
  • At the Battle of Tours (732 CE),
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!