1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prisoha [69]
2 years ago
5

The constitution dictates that the presiding officer of the senate is the

History
1 answer:
loris [4]2 years ago
6 0
Defender of the subject


hope this helps
You might be interested in
Compare and contrast Direct Democracy and Representative Democracy
irinina [24]

Answer:

  • Representative democracy is a form of democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives as opposed to a direct democracy, a form of democracy in which people vote on policy initiatives directly.
  • In a representative democracy, people elect representatives to make political decisions and pass laws for them. In a direct democracy, people make all political decisions and pass laws themselves

<h2><em>PLS MARK ME </em><u><em>BRAINLIEST</em></u></h2>
6 0
3 years ago
Why was the texas annexation controversial within the US and with Mexico
Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

in order to have something

Explanation:

so that the country can be stable

4 0
3 years ago
What would be 5 outcome if dinosours werent extinct
Elena-2011 [213]
Hm...
1) we would have to compete with them for food
2) we'd have to run like h    if we saw a predator
3) we'd have much more different cities
4) some inventions might not have been invented
5) some modern species would be extinct, or not exist
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is TRUE about Supreme Court justices? A. They are the country’s foremost authorities on state constitutio
Luda [366]

The correct answer is:

<h2>C. They are the country's foremost authorities on the Constitution.</h2>

Answer A is incorrect.  Each state has its own Supreme Court for that purpose.

Answer B is incorrect.  In some cases, where there has been an even number of justices on the court, review of a case may end in a split decision.  When a split decision occurs, then the Supreme Court's action (or lack of action, we could say) doesn't establish any legal precedent in the matter.

Answer D is incorrect.  The Chief Justice and Associate Justices all serve for life or until resignation.   There are no "temporary" justices.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The success of Christianity is widely believed by historians to have been due to its
Virty [35]
Promise of salvation
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • During World War I, blank was the term widely used to describe a state of war in which neither side was winning or gaining an ad
    9·1 answer
  • What is the modern law for this question?
    15·2 answers
  • • Debt and high interest rates
    6·1 answer
  • Why am I alive? what is the scientific reasoning behind it?
    5·2 answers
  • Which is an example of collective bargaining
    15·1 answer
  • What impact did the safety elevator have on population growth in cities?
    8·1 answer
  • In Regents v. Bakke, the Supreme Court found that
    14·2 answers
  • Which US branch of government has the most members? legislative judicial executive
    15·1 answer
  • The history of chocolate  Mayans and Aztecs
    12·1 answer
  • What are some of the accomplishments of the international conference on harmonization in 1990?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!