Let's start with an obvious one. He certainly is not a coward. He was willing to take on a dog that was ferocious; in contrast, Heathcliff makes the comment that the "cowardly children also crept forward..." That quoted phrase is somewhere near the very end.
Your first example of yellow underlining is a wonderful example. Heathcliff is quite common and he would use common English. He characterizes Cathy as being gentile and not given to saying anything contrary to her upbringing.
I would note that Heathcliff followed grumbling execrations and vengeance. [an execration is a threat denouncement or curse. Again Heathcliff is showing his common upbringing. Cathy would choke before she would utter such things. This one is kind of iffy. You could omit it. It is by inference something that shows that Heathcliff is different].
Your second underlined statement is correct. It characterizes Heathcliff as a robber and a thief and part of a lowlife gang. You could go on. Robert does not hesitate to make his feelings known and adds to what you underlined.
Your third underlined statement is correct as well. I have added two but your examples are fine.
Who marks this? Make an appeal if you get it wrong. Interpreting literature is that way. This is not exactly a factual question and the only way to answer it is to compare Heathcliff to someone else. I chose Robert and Cathy. Write your instructor and provide some of the evidence you have provided here.
Answer:
My parents WERE at the supermarket this morning.
Explanation:
Art is the beauty of everything ever created. science, on the other hand, is the exactness of everything that ever existed. the science of art describes the art and how it was made; the art of science is how it doesn’t just flow, and how it can explain the unimaginable. art is “better” than science because it is important to realize and appreciate the beauty in everyday life.
furthermore, everything from the stars to the way everything works is what science is. cells and atoms are the basic units of life and matter. those cells and those atom make up beautiful people and astonishing structures. without science, there is no explanation to how the solar system works, or how gravity actually affects us.
contrastingly, art explains and expresses the way artists feel. similar to how song writers express their feelings through songs, artists can express it through paintings, sketches, sculptures, and so many other art forms. unlike science, the beauty of art is that an image is worth a thousand words.
in conclusion, art is “better” than science because you can express yourself through it without having to use complicated formulas or another level of understanding. science requires complex formulas and thinking, which makes it seems as if it is forced. art isn’t forced, it just flows and naturally comes out. art gives artists the opportunity to beautifully express themselves, while in science, you can’t exactly express yourself. with art, you can create masterpieces of science, that don’t require using complicated equations to create them. artworks are worth thousands of words and emotions.
True the shepherd woos his love by telling her how beautiful she is.
Answer:
No one is allowed to say anything in your life.
