I think the supporting material in this speech is poor. The student gives a lot of information about statistics, which is very helpful, but doesn't give details about which organisms studied the topic. Where did the student found these statistics? Who did them? Are they specialized in the subject?
The student mentions the doctors by saying "many doctors". Who are these doctors, which are their names, which are their specialties?
The student after says that there are "<em>other institutions</em>" that suggest that a child whose body weight is at least 20% higher than a child of a similar height is obese. Which are these "<em>other institutions</em>"?
Then, the student takes the discussed issue a little lightly when saying "<em>No matter what the exact definition</em>" after saying how complicated this illness is. Does the student think it is not important to know the exacts definition? If not, who says that?
I think this speech has to have probationary documentation. All these facts and statics mentioned don't have support. The student doesn't name even one of the organizations, doctors, authorities specialized in the subject he or she is referring to.
It is a very serious topic, about a serious disease, and has to be addressed with consciousness. If not, it seems like everything is the student's opinion and we know what he or she is saying is probably true. The student has to name every document he or she read in order to give this information.
The answer to the question is C.
Answer:
2, 4
Explanation
These both showcase emotion and make the text more entertaining for the reader.
Sense of urgency is reflected in a sentence structure that is short in which the thought is direct to the point. The sentence should be read quickly and that make sure that the message can be conveyed clearly and that the reader understoods easily. Answer then is B.
Answer:
We need a picture of the passage
