Answer:
Im not gonna explain i will give you the answer that i came up with I currently have 60 right now hope this is right
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
.55 difference or 11/20
Step-by-step explanation: hope this helps
(Don't know what the number line looks like)
Convert both to decimals, then subtract
Answer:
try c hope this helps
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the data, the most likely correlation coefficient would be -1.
The slope between 20 and 30 days is -1, and it represents the change in the surface area of the lake per day.
The data represents correlation, not causation.
Since the data would form a perfectly straight line through the points, the correlation coefficient would be -1 for a perfect decreasing fit.
To find the slope, find the change in the surface area between those days, the change in the days, and write it as surface area/days: 80-90=-10; 30-20=10; -10/10=-1
This is not causation because there could be lurking variables we cannot see.
First to solve this problem you need to identify a variable to write the inequality.
Let
x = number of points that Carter scores.
The inequality can then be written as:
x> 100
answer:
an inequality to show how may points Carter needs to earn is
x> 100
