Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
The United Nations (UN)
Explanation:
After the many failures of the League of Nations, the countries involved knew they had to make a stronger league that would better protect them from war and world conflict. I believe this happened in 1945, though, not 1943.
It would be "d. monarchy vs. representative government," that did not cause arguments at the Constitutional Convention, since all of the representatives knew that there should be a representative government of some sort. <span />
Answer: It was the Greeks
To fight for their freedom, so they won’t be slaves anymore.
