Answer:
$ 75131
Explanation:
Given:
Amount inherited = $ 300000
Present amount of annuity = $ 300000
Interest rate, i = 8% = 0.08
number of years, n = 5
Now,
the formula for the present amount of annuity is given as:
Present amount of annuity =
where,
P is the periodic payment
n is the number of years
now, on substituting the values, we get
$ 300000 =
or
$ 300000 = P × 3.993
or
P = $ 75131.48 ≈ $ 75131
hence, the amount he can withdraw is $ 75131
A study of the growth of English language learners (ELLs) in first-time kindergarten students (N = 19,890) from kindergarten through eighth grade was conducted.
Growth curve analyses showed that, when other factors were held constant, ELLs continued to improve at a steeper rate on these social/behavioral outcomes than their native English-speaking peers.
In kindergarten, teachers rated ELLs more favorably on approaches to learning, self control, and externalizing behaviors than native English speakers did.
Depending on the grade at which English competence is reached, ELLs and native English speakers achieve reading and math skills differently.
To be more precise, ELLs who were proficient by the time they entered kindergarten kept up with native English speakers in both reading and math initially and over time.
ELLs who were proficient by the time they entered first grade had modest gaps in reading and math achievement compared to native English speakers that either narrowed or persisted over time.
Learning English before entering kindergarten is associated with superior cognitive and behavioral results through the eighth grade for students whose first language is not English.
To learn more about kindergarten here
brainly.com/question/16884560
#SPJ4
Answer:
It is called A PERMANENT FUND.
Explanation: A PERMANENT FUND is a type of governmental fund that is used to record and account for endowments such as gifts for government or non governmental organisations.
This fund often times is used in financing civic projects, facilities owned by the city concerned and the likes.
Answer:
B. The denial is justifiable given the level of interbrand competition.
Explanation:
Anti trust law only applicable if you can proof that two or more producers in the same industry work together in order to assert their control over the market. They can do this through price fixing, controlling the amount of supply, etc.
This condition<em> can't be found</em> in the scenario above.
The denial that done by PepsiCo is justifiable because in a really competitive market, a company need to impose a strict requirement on which entities they should form a dealership relation with. If PepsiCo choose the wrong dealers, Its competitors could easily taken over the market and resulted in a huge amount of loss for the company.
Answer: Has increased.
Explanation: Income per person has increased over the years because the cost of living and expenses have also increased. As the cost of items go up, income increases to help consumers be able to afford living and purchasing goods and services.