Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
In point a:
If the parent firm doesn't hold the conglomerate's equity stake, depreciation expense acknowledged by the parent company's owner and expenditures shall be removed throughout the consolidated statement of financial position. Its combined cash flow deletes debts previously recognized as assets for both the parent corporation and as debts for all the subsidiaries to offer a real and equal view. All the intragroup balance should be removed to avoid double-counting of financial assets resulting from payments in between the group's members.
In point b:
If a parent company has a stake in a subsidiary that is called noncontrolling interest over 50%, but less than 99 percent. Its parent company shall report a different non-controlling interest line on the income statement and revenue report to reveal its noncontrolling interest.
In point c:
Its Group of non - management Concerns may not claim responsibility mostly on a share of a benefit, doesn't have any influence from over parent's decision. Intra-group payments in a word-level shall be removed.
In point d:
Its NCI share of the opening in net assets of the subsidiary + NCI share of even an amortization fair value + NCI profits due to NCI - (dividend payable to the noncontrolling shareholder) = unlawful interest at the date of the merger is three steps for the calculation of total the uncontrol value.
Answer:
a. 208.57 units
b. 104.29 units
Explanation:
a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:


= 208.57 units
b. And, the average inventory is
= Economic order quantity ÷ 2
= 208.57 units ÷ 2
= 104.29 units
We simply applied the above formulas for calculation of the economic order quantity and the average inventory and the same is shown above
The answer is contingency design. It is the sum incorporated into a development spending plan to take care of extra expenses for conceivable outline changes. The measure of possibility fluctuates with the phases of outline. As the plan is finished, the possibility ought to be diminished to almost zero for most school ventures.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question we can say that Yes, the dealership is contractually bound to sell Mike the car at that price. This is assuming that the ad handed to the dealership by Mike is an actual ad that was designed and published by the dealership. If this is the case the dealership must uphold their price or it will be considered false advertisement and Mike would have a basis on which to sue the business.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.