Answer:
2. Only counting final goods
Explanation:
When defining national income accounting and terminolgies, emphasis is always laid on "...total value of FINAL goods...". This is as a result of avoiding double counting. If intermediate goods were counted alongside final goods, it would be double counting because intermediate goods are used in producing those final goods. Final goods are good meant for final consumption. The other method used in avoiding double counting ( counting of the value of the same product more than once) apart from counting final gooda is Value added approach.
I think so, but there may be some exceptions--if any.
Answer:
Please refer to the below for the appropriate journal entry
Explanation:
Accounts receivable Dr $726,700
($676,000 + $50,700)
Sales revenue account Cr $676,000
Sale taxes payable account Cr $50,700
{(6% + 1.5%) × $676,000
Answer:
It is more profitable to continue to rework the phones and sell them.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Signal mistakenly produced 1,000 defective cell phones.
<u>The $65 per phone is a sunk cost. It will remain on both decisions, therefore, we will not take into account to make the decision.</u>
Sell as it is:
Income= 33*1,000= $33,000
Rework:
Costs= 88*1,000= $88,000
Sales= 144*1,000= $144,000
Total gain= $56,000
It is more profitable to continue to rework the phones and sell them.
