<span>Let's look at the various options and see which one makes sense.
a.kings evenly distributed items.
* This option would assume that every place prior to money being invented had a king. That doesn't make sense, so this option is wrong.
b.merchants and customers bartered.
* This option works. I have X and want Y, you have Y and want X. Let's trade. Or perhaps you have Y, but want Z. But that 3rd person over there is willing to trade Z for X, so between the 3 of us, we can each get what we want by trading what we have an excess of. Rather cumbersome, but it worked prior to the development of money. This is the correct choice.
c.individuals were self-sufficient.
* No man is an island unto himself. No one have every skill they need to live. So this is a bad choice.
d.priests evenly distributed items.
* The priests would have liked this option, but it too is a bad choice.</span>
Answer:
Hence, the evidence that describes the use of rainforest plants as anticancer drugs is: Twenty-five percent of the active ingredients in cancer drugs are exclusively rainforest plants.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
History today is a magazine company
Published by Andy Patterson
Edited by Paul Lay
Explanation:
I think it might be c but I could be wrong
Number one; hierarchy authority, the few top ranking officials.
Number two; job specialization, everyone has a job.
Number three; formalize rules, set established rules. All used to create efficiency
