1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
7

Identify the fallacy of relevance in the following passage. But can you doubt that the air has weight when you have the clear te

stimony of Aristotle affirming that all the elements have weight including air, and excepting only fire? —Galileo, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences(a) The Argument from Ignorance (b) Begging the Question (c) The Appeal to Emotion (d) The Appeal to Pity
Social Studies
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<u>Appeal to authority:</u> The argument is sustained by the afirmation that t is true because Aristotle said so.

Explanation:

This type of fallacy appeals to authority means that the argument  bases itself by appealing to an authority. Aristotle was an importan Philosopher of acient Greece. So appealing to him to validate the argument would correspond to a fallacy named Appeal to authority. The argument is not based on logic premises it only says it´s valid because a figure of authority in a field says so.

You might be interested in
Is the resource shown in the image renewable or nonrenewable?
marissa [1.9K]

not an answer, but please input an image so we can answer.

the sun, water, and wind power are main sources of renewable energy. gas, coal, and fossil fuels are nonrenewable sources.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unilateral descent impacts an individual's behavior. Please explain.
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Unilateral descent impact an individuals behavior is so bad ,,

8 0
2 years ago
A defendant accused of four separate assaults pleads guilty to one assault count, and the three remaining criminal charges are d
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

A defendant accused of four separate assaults pleads guilty to one assault count, and the three remaining criminal charges are dismissed. This is an example of count bargaining.

Explanation:

A plea bargaining is an agreement in a criminal case in which the prosecutor agrees to reduce the sentence in exchange for the acknowledgment by the accused of his guilt.   Among these, the count bargaining is what causes the accused to be sentenced only by one of the multiple crimes of which he is accused.

This is a cornerstone of the criminal justice system in the United States of America, with almost all trials in urban areas being handled by this process, rather than the jury process. The prosecutor often agrees to impose a reduced sentence or to impose a fine. The negotiation of a sentence is subject to the permission of the court.

This process is very rarely applied in civil law countries, which do not apply the concept of bargaining. If the accused admits the charges, this is only evidence, but the prosecution has yet to file a complete case.

There may be several reasons for this negotiation. Most often, the prosecutor seeks to avoid the uncertainty of the jury trial. Prosecutors have, in general, a wide choice to decide which charges they will charge. Sometimes the prosecution seeks the defender's cooperation to prosecute other defendants. In other cases, prosecutors may be convicted of guilt, but the burden of proof is too difficult to establish.  

Critics of the system point out that bargaining can put a lot of pressure on the accused, who can be reduced to pleading guilty to offenses he did not commit. In this procedure, it all depends on the negotiation skills, which gives an advantage to the files in which good, and therefore expensive, lawyers are involved. In addition, the system encourages prosecutors to choose the most serious charges at the beginning of the case, to give themselves negotiating leeway. Finally, jurists, especially civil law jurisdictions, often find this principle contrary to the purpose of the law to associate an action with a penalty.

5 0
3 years ago
How many years before Columbus’ 1492 exploration did Prince Henry die?
Anton [14]

Answer:

Prince Henry the Navigator died 32 years previously in 1460.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which sentence best describes the origin of hinduism?
noname [10]

Answer:

It evolved from the intermingling of various Indian traditions and beliefs.

Explanation:

Option C is the answer.  It's kinda hard to explain for me.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Adolescents' close friendships are distinguished from their casual friendships in the types of conflicts they have. although con
    13·2 answers
  • Put the civilizations in order from the civilization that appeared first to the civilization that developed last.
    13·1 answer
  • I need help please !!!!!
    13·1 answer
  • In 1975, President Ford signed the
    6·1 answer
  • Knowledge can be best described as a. Facts, measurements, and statistics. b. Organized facts set in context and actionable. c.
    10·1 answer
  • Please helppp:((((((((​
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!
    8·1 answer
  • Tiger woods, the popular and successful professional golfer, identifies himself as
    8·2 answers
  • HELP ME <br> PLEASE .....
    6·2 answers
  • Define the concept “ environmental issues “
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!