Answer:
Hopeful
P.S.- I read it in first semester in 8th grade
Answer:
In a sense, everyone tries to control the future. By studying for a test, you attempt to influence your future grade, for example. Listening to the witches and attempting to use the information they give him to change the future is qualitatively different from normal acts to influence the future within this play because of the religious implications of consorting with witches and trying to alter the future through supernatural means, which usurps divine justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
this is what i would say, I've read this b4 and had a question similar
Explanation:
One way I would describe dictatorship in the story is when the man was using his power to hurt Nina when she kept saying that she doesn’t know where the general is. They beat her up badly, and didn’t let her go to her son, even when she implored* that he was going to die. She had no way to escape especially since she was feeble*. This person, is a barbarous* and egocentric* person that only cares about his power, and that tries his best to get what he wants and not in a good way,: “Well if you won’t answer we’ll make you crush some quicklime and see if that reminds you which way the general went!...One of the men guarding the door pushed her roughly to the ground; another gave her a kick which laid her flat...At twenty to five they left her lying unconscious on the ground….“Oh my son is dying! Oh my son is dying! Oh my life, my little one, my life! For God’s sake come! Open up, for God’s sake, open the door! My son is dying! Holy Virgin! Blessed Saint Anthony! Jesus of Saint Catherine!”. This conveys that this dictatorship shown here in the text is cruel and he doesn't care what type of person he beats up, he tries his best to get what he wants even if it means hurting people and killing them.
1*= begged
2*= week
3*= exceedingly brutal
4*= selfish; only cares about himslef
i really hope that this helped :D
Answer:
Many people agree with the phrase "where there is no law, there is no freedom." Essentially, this phrase implies that in order to exercise the rights that emanate from freedom (freedom of expression, freedom of movement, freedom of religion, etc.), a minimum of regulation is necessary, allowing these rights to be exercised fairly and equitably. , preventing people, in the exercise of their own rights, from injuring the rights of others.
Thus, for example, the right to freedom of movement has limits: everyone has the freedom to move without restrictions, except in those places that are privately owned, which functions as a limit that protects the right to property and privacy from the owners.
As can be seen, laws regulate the scope of rights, to avoid conflicts that could trigger social chaos. Therefore, in the absence of laws, freedoms would be so absolute that they would end up nullifying each other, so in practice such freedom would not exist.
Answer:
fhfhfhffbdhdbxhcvbbbdhcds bbxhcbsjcgd cgs cgdbhdhbvwhhvb
Explanation:
