<span>This is a tricky question, because
most of the answers provided are correct. For instance, by raising taxes, the
government drops down the demand rates, as well as by decreasing the money
supply (in that case, it also prevents economy from falling into an inflating
situation). As for balancing the budget, this economical move entails
decreasing the public expenditure and, therefore, contracting the demanding economical
figures too. </span>
Answer:
-$414,444.44
Explanation:
The computation of the net present value is shown below:
Net present value = Initial investment + net cash flows ÷ (required rate of return - projected growth rate)
= -$1,570,000 + $104,000 ÷ (12% - 3%)
= -$1,570,000 + $1,155,555.56
= -$414,444.44
Hence, the net present value is -$414,444.44
Since the net present value comes in negative so the project is rejected
Answer:
$13,241
Explanation:
From the data we were given in the question:
future value = fv = $1,500,000
time = t = 30 year
rate = r = 8%
We are required to find out How much does he need to invest to achieve his goal
solution
future value = principal ( 1+ rate)^(t-1) / rate
1500000 = principal (1 + .08)^(30-1)/ 0.08
we make principal, p, subject of the formula.
principal = 1500000 / ( (1 + .08)^(30-1)/ 0.08 )
Principal = 1,500,000 / 113.2832
principal = 13241.15
so Dan needs to invest $13241
Answer: d. The ongoing need of company managers to react and respond to changing market and competitive conditions
Explanation:
As market changes and becomes more competitive, there is need to ensure that partially finished goods awaiting completion(work in progress) are completed.
