Answer:
B. equals the relative price of the two goods.
Explanation:
A budget constraint refers to how much money a person or a company has to spend in any given pair of goods or services, e.g. you have $10 and you want to eat hot dogs and drink Coke.
The slope of the budget constraint refers to the relative price of the two goods or services, e.g. a hot dogs costs $2 and a Coke costs $1.50. The slope of the budget constraint = $1.50 / $2 = 0.75. The slope of a budget constraint is always equal or less than 1, that is why the smallest value is the numerator.
Answer:
Hammer would prevail against Kay based on:_______.
A. Unilateral contract.
Explanation:
A unilateral contract is a contract created by an offer that can only be accepted by performance. To form the contract, the party making the offer (called the “offeror”) makes a promise in exchange for the act of performance by the other party.
in relation to the case in the contract, Hammer had carried out the duties expected of him thus making the contract valid under a unilateral contract.
since in a unilateral contract, the offer can only be accepted when the other party completely performs the requested action.
Hence Hammer would prevail against Kay based on Unilateral contract.
Answer:
inputs, outputs, transformation processes, and feedback.
Explanation:
The viewpoint of the system that could see the organziation as the entities as they should be made of the input as the raw material, output as the finished product, transformation process as when the raw material is converted into the finished product and the feedback as the client feedback related to the product and service
So as per the given situation the above should be the answer
