1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Juliette [100K]
3 years ago
14

Difference between Dan and bakas​

Law
1 answer:
RSB [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

First, roasting and baking involve different food structures. When you have a food that is already solid, such as meat, you will roast it, but baking involves using heat to solidify a liquid batter. ... Baking, on the other hand, uses lower temperatures to allow a batter to solidify and cook slowly.

Explanation:

This is from a textbook resource

You might be interested in
Which portions is NHLE currently engaged in?
dalvyx [7]

Answer:

Trade tracker

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Assume that the state legislature of Kansas passes a law providing that confessions are admissible in state court criminal cases
avanturin [10]

This law is unlikely to be constitutional.

The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.

3 0
4 years ago
What do you think about when you hear us law
svlad2 [7]
Laws,Police,ummmm humans
4 0
3 years ago
HEY! Vaping is not cool. Especially if you are below the age of 18 or older. No one should vape, not even adults because it can
spayn [35]

Yes it isn't good for the health of a child or anyone at all.

6 0
3 years ago
Who was the 1963 supreme court case ruled that states are required by the 6th amendment to provide legal counsel for defendants
Nadya [2.5K]

Answer: Gideon verses Wainwright case

Explanation:

The Gideon verses Wainwright, was a landmark case in the Supreme Court of United States.

After this case the Supreme court made a rule that states under the sixth amendment of US Constitution that emphasizes over the provision of attorney or defense lawyer to the defendant or criminal who cannot afford or seek the judicial guidance.

The case gave birth to the right to counsel in the court of law, that made the imposition of the requirement of defendant given a priority before conviction.

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Lincoln-Douglas debate, the negative should take prep time before the ________ and ________.
    13·1 answer
  • What do you think juvenile courts will be like in 20 or 30 years?
    7·1 answer
  • An accounting report that shows the changes in capital during the accounting period is a/an
    15·1 answer
  • A judge decides that a juvenile should be tried as an adult for the crime that she is on trial for. What action would the judge
    15·1 answer
  • Amy joined the US Army and must undergo the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). How often must Amy pass the test to prove herself
    13·1 answer
  • What effect did Ruth Bader Ginsburg have on the Virginia Military Institute?
    8·1 answer
  • Sitting prosecutors give much attention to quality recommendations. Why? Name three reasons for this in approximately 150 words.
    6·1 answer
  • 9. A heavier person will have a lower blood alcohol level due to a greater amount of
    12·2 answers
  • This amendment explains that the president can only serve 2 full terms.
    12·1 answer
  • When driving at night and you encounter curves what do you have to remember?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!