What is the main difference in our Constitution from other countries according to President Ronald Reagan?

1 answer:

3 0

Reagan was able to revive the spirit of the American people. Particularly, he was able to rekindle interest in the Constitution, especially the role of the judiciary in being faithful to the Constitution

<u> Explanation: </u>

Ronald Reagan was elected as the 40th president of America. He took office at the worst time of American history. He has always had a strong belief in the US constitution which is considered to be one of the oldest constitutions of the world.

Reagan was able to bring about a change in the American people by creating importance of the Constitution, particularly in the field of judiciary which is the agency which can uphold the Constitution.

In his inaugural speech he used the term “we the people” which is of great importance in the constitution. He served American people for 8 years with strong faith in the constitution.

You might be interested in

How would you handle your caseload during a pandemic?

BartSMP [9]

Explanation:

the total caseload is now growing by well over 10,000 daily in Europe. One had a steep peak indicating a surge of coronavirus outbreak in the handle the demand, so people must wait on the platform for their turn

6 0

3 years ago

17. Which is the most common method of disguising a stolen vehicle? (1 point)

Anna11 [10]

Answer:

From most cases I have studied it has mostly been changing the painting or applying fake linsince plates. But the most reasonable on here would be Alerting or switching the vehicle identification number

7 0

3 years ago

1. A person designated by the court whose knowledge exceeds the knowledge of anyone with a

wel

Answer:

i think its an expert witness

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

How does a command economy differ from a mixed market economy?

frez [133]

Explanation:

I think the answer is c but i don't know for sure

8 0

2 years ago

he state of New Jersey says it is sovereign over certain landfilled portions of Ellis Island. The state of New York disagrees, a

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

No, it shouldn't. In the present case, it is a conflict of interest between two states: the states of New York and New Jersey, with respect to Ellis Island and the inter-jurisdictional waters of the Hudson River. Therefore, due to being a controversial matter between two states, the provisions of Article III Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which establishes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in the case. In addition, in case of recourse to the internal courts of a state, a state would be brought to litigate outside its original jurisdiction.

5 0

3 years ago