Answer:
I would say it's A.
Explanation:
It mentions "The Minnesota Department of Transportation claims that money issues were not the cause for this accident." This would eliminate choice B. D doesn't seem logical because all answers seem pretty solid, so eliminate D. Then, C isn't the best title due to the way it's said. It seems bland, so that eliminates C as well.
Answer:
Alabama’s segregation laws were unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states that everyone has the right to equal protection, privileges of the law irrespective of one's race or color. This means that even blacks have the same rights to ride or use public transport as whites.
So, the bus boycott that resulted because of a segregated seating for blacks was deemed rightful. The Supreme Court in its December 20, 1956, ruling states that all persons, irrespective of race or color, must be given the same treatment. The court ruled Alabama's segregation laws unconstitutional and resulted in the integration of Montgomery buses the next day.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
I believe The answer is A.
It depends on the situation...were they kicked out or did they willingly move out?
If they are kicked out then they are then homeless, but if they willingly moved out and moved into another place, they just simply moved.
Not sure if that is the answer you were looking for, but that's all I can give you unless you provide more details to your question. Hope it helped! :)
