Answer: A.) Project A, because it has a higher present value than project B.
B.) Project B
Explanation:
Particulars --------- project A ----------- project B
Annual cash flow -- 42000 ------------ 48000
Interest rate --------- 12% ----------------- 12%
Number of years ---- 8 -------------------- 7
Calculating the present value of both projects using a financial calculator :
At 12% rate of return :
PV of project A = $233,677.77
PV of project B = $219,060.31
B.) At 14% rate of return:
PV of project A = $222,108.80
PV of project B = $234,656.04
Answer:
Total incremental net income = $28,000
Incremental per gallon increase in net income = $0.70 per unit
Explanation:
a. The preparation of incremental statement to find out the increase in net income
Total production $140,000
Less:
Incremental cost
Direct material $68,000
($1.70 × 40,000 gallons)
Direct labor $24,000
($0.60 × 40,000 gallons)
Variable manufacturing
overhead $20,000
($0.50 × 40,000 gallons)
Total incremental cost ($112,000)
Total incremental net income $28,000
b. Incremental per gallon increase in net income = Total incremental net income ÷ Total quantity
= $28,000 ÷ 40,000 gallons
= $0.70 per unit
Therefore the total incremental net income is $28,000 and incremental per gallon increase in net income is $0.70 per unit.
Answer:
a.higher than the market rate of interest
Explanation:
If bonds are issued at a premium, the stated interest rate is <u>higher than the market rate of interest.</u>
- If the company issues the binds at a premium, it means that the company is getting more money than the face value of the bond.
- This happens because the demand for the bind is high in the market.
- The demand is high because the company offers higher interest rate as compared to market interest rate.
- If the bonds are issued at a discount, then the stated interest rate is lower than the market interest rate.
Answer:
Correct option is C
Explanation:
Increase in \alpha decreases πt - π(t-1) which shows decrease in natural rate of unemployment.
Phillips bend clarifies the connection between expansion rate and joblessness rate. As indicated by it there is a reverse connection between the joblessness rate and swelling rate. It implies there is an exchange off among expansion and joblessness rate.
The strategy ramifications of Phillips bend is that administration can't lessen swelling and joblessness together. It joblessness decreases, at that point the economy must acknowledge higher expansion. Then again, on the off chance that economy lessens expansion, at that point it must acknowledge higher joblessness.
When there is synchronous change in the swelling rate and joblessness rate then this is an instance of development along the short-run Phillips bend.
Then again, when either joblessness rate or swelling rate stays unaltered while different changes then it prompts moving of short-run Phillips bend.
