Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

5

What was the United States’ role in international politics in the late 1700s?

2 answers:

Irina-Kira [14]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

They had just won their independence, so they weren't involved in European affairs due to the limited power they had and their focus on their country's stability.

Explanation:

The Revolutionary War had ended in 1783, and Congress haven't made an official leader named, nor enforced order in the country, so there was little chance they had enough authority to be recognized in European countries and were weakened from the war.

LekaFEV [45]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

What was the United States’ role in international politics in the late 1700s?

Question 2 options:

America supported the British in international war.

America tried to remain neutral despite international war.

America supported the French in international war.

America tried to remain neutral despite Washington’s belief we should go to war.

Explanation:

the answer is

America tried to remain neutral despite Washington’s belief we should go to war.

You might be interested in

Before the Roman Emperors, Representatives ruled Rome. This is best described as a:

stira [4]

B i think im 99.9 shuere

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following was a consequence of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo?

White raven [17]

Answer:

The war between the United States and Mexico ended.

Explanation:

The war between the United States and Mexico ended was a consequence of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which act declared British taxing authority in the colonies was the same as its authority in Great Britain? A. The Stamp Act B.

Zarrin [17]

The Townsend act of 1767

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1840s what led to the question of whether slavery should expand to the territories

Ganezh [65]

The result of the Mexican war

5 0

3 years ago

If legislators weren’t afforded immunities, how would the democratic process suffer?

eduard

Answer:

<h3>Representatives will be unable to support the rights of the people effectively.</h3>

Explanation:

Legislative immunity provides senators and representatives the right to speak and state their opinions in the Congress without any fear of arbitrary arrest or defamation.
This is done not to ensure the interest of the speaker but to protect the voice of the people which the speaker is representing.
In a democracy the voice of the people is taken into account without fail. Therefore, the need to protect the representatives to speak or state their opinions in the Congress on behalf of the people becomes mandatory.
If the provision of legislative immunity is not allowed, the essence of democratic process to represent and support the rights of the people would be ineffective.

8 0

3 years ago