Answer:
a) Product G should be produced and sold
b) Net financial advantage $80
Explanation:
<em>A company should process further a product if the additional revenue from the split-off point is greater than than the further processing cost. </em>
<em>Also note that all cost incurred up to the split-off point are irrelevant to the decision to process further . </em>
$
Revenue after split-off point
($9× 40 litres) 360
Revenue at the slit of point
($4 × 40) <u> (160)</u>
Additional income from further processing 200
Further processing cost ($3× 40) <u>(120)</u>
Incremental income from further processing <u> 80</u>
Incremental income from further processing = $80
a) The product F should be processed further and sold as product G. Doing so would increase the net income by $80.
b) Net advantage $80
Answer:
immediately challenge the rule by filing a complaint with the administrative agency.
Explanation:
Since the new rule is affecting it's business by increasing cost andaking paperwork cumbersome, Al's Car Shack can file a complaint with the administrative agency stating it's case.
There is no dispute yet so there is no need to challenge the rule in court at this time.
If the administrative agency cannot settle with Al's Car Shack the case may go to court.
Answer:
Sabrina’s Soccer has a comparative advantage over Stan’s Sporting Goods because Sabrina’s Soccer has a lower opportunity cost.
Answer:
225,000 shares
Explanation:
A company's shares outstanding refers to the total number of shares investors currently own.
Beck Corp. issued 200,000 shares of common stock when it began operations in year 1 and issued an additional 100,000 shares in year 2.
In year 3, Beck purchased 75,000 shares of its common stock and held it in Treasury.
At December 31, year 3, the number of shares of Beck's common stock were outstanding is
200,000 shares in year 1
100,000 shares in year 2
Total Common Stock = 300,000
less: Treasury Stock of 75,000
Outstanding Stock = 225,000 shares
Adam was unable to finish high school because he needed to go to work to help his family financially. This forms a Non-formative type of influence
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a Non-formative type of influence?</h3>
Generally, The term "nonnormative effects" refers to those that do not affect each member of a set in the same manner. Nonnormative suggests it does not affect everyone in the same way in the culture, while normative suggests it does (or not at all).
In conclusion, Adam dropped out of school before he could graduate from high school because he had to start earning money to support his family. This is an example of a non-formative impact.
Read more about the Non-formative type of influence
brainly.com/question/6912636
#SPJ1
