10% of Heller's income for January 1 to August 31, plus 40% of Heller's income for the remainder of the year.
Explanation:
In spite of a retrospective strategy, Mumford puts the 10 per cent owned by the creditor firm together with the 30% purchased on Sep 1 which accounts for 40 per cent of the sales of Heller.
Retrospective, the committee focuses on the team members ' collaboration and looks for ways to enhance the process, based on the lessons learned in the recent work .
It is time to reflect on past events and experiences – outside the daily routine.
Retrospective thinking occurs whenever one remembers something from the past, but one can also think retrospectively about hypothetical future events, by imagining that the event has already transpired and then working backward in the mind from the future toward the present.
Answer:
1.- Without Retrospective effect
2.- No as it comes from a change in estimations not an accounting error.
3.- yes. It will give a full explanation about the reasons to extend the useful life.
4.- Depreciation expense for 2021: 60,000
Explanation:
1.- The change in the useful life does not represent an accounting error. It comes from the estimation process.
800,000 - 160,000 x 2 = 480,000 book value at beginning 2021
480,000 / 8 new useful life = 60,000 depreciation per year.
<span>20% is the maximum speed up possible for this program.
For this problem, let's assign the time of 1 for the task when using a single processor. Now let's assume that we have an infinite number of processors available to handle the portion of the program that can be executed in parallel so that the execution time for that portion will be 0. That means that the total execution time with an infinite number of processors will be
1 * (0.80 + 0) = 1 * 0.80 = 0.80
So at best, the parallel program will take 80% of the time for the single threaded version. So the speed increase will be
(1 - 0.80) / 1 = 0.20/1 = 0.20 = 20%</span>
