Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the selling price per composite unit:</u>
<u></u>
selling price per composite unit= 1,280*0.6 + 530*0.4
selling price per composite unit= $980
<u>Now, the unitary variable cost per composite unit:</u>
Variable cost per composite unit= 780*0.6 + 280*0.4
Variable cost per composite unit= $580
<u>To calculate the break-even point in units, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per composite unit
Break-even point in units= 150,000 / (980 - 580)
Break-even point in units= 375
<u>Finally, the number of units per product:</u>
Desks= 375*0.6= 225
Chairs= 375*0.4= 150
Answer: A perfectly inelastic supply curve means that<u><em> the quantity supplied is completely fixed.</em></u>
Perfectly inelastic supply states that supply is completely fixed. Therefore it is not affected by the change in price level.
<u><em>Therefore, the correct option in this case is (e)</em></u>
Answer:
She can deduct the full $120,000. the answer is $120,000.
Explanation:
Therefore, M is following cash basis of accounting , She can deduct the full $120,000 amount. Under cash system, expenses are recorded when cash is paid irrespective of whether it is accrued or not.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Income tax expense A/c Dr $30,035,000
To Deferred tax asset A/c $35,000
To Income tax payable A/c $30,000,000
(Being the income tax expense is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
For deferred tax asset:
= Deferred tax rate - Warrant liability × tax rate
= $435,000 - $1,000,000 × 40%
= $435,000 - $400,000
= $35,000
For income tax payable:
= Taxable income × tax rate
= $75,000,000 × 40%
= $30,000,000
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
