The answer is magnification. It is trusted that adverse reasoning examples, known as subjective contortions, add to a man's manifestations of discouragement or tension. At the point when a man is thinking with the intellectual bending of magnification, they are either dramatically overemphasizing things or diminishing their significance.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above is STRUCK-BY HAZARD. A construction inspector was crossing an equipment vehicle route at an interstate highway bridge construction site. He walked into the path of the end loader traveling the route, was run over, and killed. This hazard is called a STRUCK-BY HAZARD. Hope this answer helps.
I believe the answer is: are more likely to read your message than academic audiences.
People with business communication background are trained to interpret underlying message that come from various sources or behaviour. Academic audiences on the other hand, tend to only be able to read a certain message after its being constructed for common consumption (such as books)
That statement is true
On most cases, the punishment given to the defendant would be equal to the damages that the defendant caused to the victim.
In some circumstances, on the other hand, the court might punish the defendant with punitive damage. This will make the defendant receive harsher punishment that exceeds the damage that the defendant caused to the victim.
usually, punitive damages only given to dangerous violation in order to set up an example for other citizens to avoid that same violation.
