Answer:
Those without Legal status in the United States, takes for granted the rights United society grant each citizens. This is because, they would never know the efforts those citizens made to see that the social services like free medical insurance, free education, benefits for low income earners etc are provided.
<em>This effors are mostly made in form of taxes taken out from their salaries or business unlike those without legal status (illigal immigrants ) who hardly pay tax but still benefits from all these services. </em>
<em>It is like buying a car with your money while someone in your street drives the car out of you garage each day before you wake up and return it late in the night before repeating same thing the next day.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
the answer would be the constitution
<u>Answer:
</u>
The court should grant the motion, because the plaintiff supported his motion with substantial evidence indicating that the defendant was negligent, and the defendant did not come forward with admissible evidence in rebuttal.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- To prove the negligent behavior of the defendant, the plaintiff is expected to present enough evidence to cover the proof of negligence in all the four elements of negligence, namely duty, breach, cause, and harm.
- If the evidence to prove all the four are present, the court most probably grants the motion in the favor of the plaintiff.
Before the Renaissance, during the Middle Ages, people relied solely on the Catholic church for their information about the world. They based their facts on the Bible and what religious figures told them. During the Renaissance, a more secular way of thinking developed. As the printing press grew, more people became literate and were able to interpret the Bible for themselves. This led to the creation of new religions and theories about science. People began to challenge the old social order and authorities and began to question the morals and motives of the seemingly corrupt Catholic church.
