Answer:
committed the fallacy of avoiding the issue.
Explanation:
The fallacy of avoiding the issue is also called the fallacy of irelevant conclusion or a red herring.
It occurs when an individual avoids dealing with an issue that he has a problem with.
In the given scenario the issue is whether bluegrass is better than Alfa Alfa for cattle in the Midwest.
Instead of Juan to address the issue he is arguing that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is a bloated bureaucracy with too much fat that deserves to be cut in the next federal budget bill.
He is not addressing the main issue
I think d is the answer
Explanation:
all stakeholders must not be independent all must work together
Answer:
Debt
Explanation:
Debt is the lowest cost source of financing because the <em>interest</em> return given to holders of debt has a <em>tax shield</em> (tax deductible) that is provided by the Section 11j of the Income tax Act.
The other sources of finance give a return in form of <em>dividends</em>. Dividends are are not tax deductible hence they attract a huge cost.
Answer: in a federal court, since the United States is a party to the litigation.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario in the question, in case Hickory Manufacturing elects to sue the United States in order to get back the $24700 federal tax refund which wasn't given to the company, it must be done in a federal court because the the IRS is a federal administrative agency and hence, the matter can't be pursued in the North Carolina state court.
Therefore, the correct option is A "in a federal court, since the United States is a party to the litigation".
Answer:
$9,760.48
Explanation:
Present value of annuity due = P* [[1 - (1+r)^-(n-1)] / r] + P. Where P = Periodic payment = $1,000, r = Rate of interest per period 4% (0.48/12), n = number of payments 12 (12*1)
Present value of annuity = $1000 * [[1 - (1 + 0.04)^-(12-1)] / 0.04] + $1000
Present value of annuity = $1000*8.760475 + $1000
Present value of annuity = $8760.48 + $1000
Present value of annuity = $9,760.48
