The better the IRR, the better. but, a corporation may additionally decide on a mission with a decreased IRR as it has other intangible advantages, together with contributing to a larger strategic plan or impeding competition.
Solution:
NPV of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+10.5%) + $250//(1+10.5%)^2 +$10//(1+10.5%)^3 +$5//(1+10.5%)^4 =25.49320776
IRR of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+r%) + $250//(1+r%)^2 +$10//(1+r%)^3 +$5//(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.80%
NPV of Project L = -$1,000+ $5/(1+10.5%) +$260/(1+10.5%)^2 + $420/(1+10.5%)^3 + $802.50/(1+10.5%)^4
=$67.01
IRR of Project L=
-$1,000+ $5/(1+r%) +$260/(1+r%)^2 + $420/(1+r%)^3 + $802.50/(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.700%
Project L is better than Project S since L has higher NPV
IRR of Project L is 12.7%.
Learn more about IRR here:-brainly.com/question/28428807
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is b. Surpluses drive down prices
Explanation:
If you have a large volume of crops, it would not drive up the price simply because there is not a lot of demand for the crop. In that sense, both c and d (even though d is relevant to the equipment) are incorrect. If there is a lot of surplus, farmers will have to lower their prices in order to sell it. They lose in profit which is why large crop surplus are a problem for farmers.
The answer to this question is Simple;informal
Simple contracts usually will be used if the transaction happens in small scale (it held small amount of value)
Which means that both parties either believe in one another or they simply do not care enough about the contract to care about the legal precautions.
The upside of changing its assembling frameworks is to enhanced item quality and lessened preparing time.
JIT and the lean maker has numerous bene±ts including enhanced item quality and diminished handling time, and decreased waste and stock, bring down work and generation costs, and expanded assembling adaptability.
$788 to me and my brother in law I come see him
