Is this a question or statement? Because I know a lot of people who are religious and eat meat...
Intriguing and interesting words to sweeten the articles
Answer: a. Power assertion.
Explanation: children who are rebellious and aggressive are often a product of parents who often assert power on their children, this type of parents or guidance does not show love to this kids, the children will grow up becoming very rebellious and aggressive, because this was the character of the person their have grown up with,
This children has not seen love from the one their tend to love them most. Many of them don't understand what love is, they tend to believe life to be all about their own will, and getting things from others, their have to use power and aggressive style to make them subdue under their own will.
This is a very wrong approach towards children,and this is an abuse of power toward the child. A parent or guidance found training up his child in this way should be charged for child abuse.
Let's also use Solders for an example, 90% of this Solders are aggressive, though not rebellious because they are disciplined to be under the law. This Solders are always aggressive because, they have been brutalized and trained with power assertion by their commanders, so it now became their life style, to be aggressive, and rebellious to any command that is not coming from their commandant or a senior citizen of the country.
Ross contends that when two prima facie duties conflict, we are unable to decide what to do.
More about prima facie duties:
Ross claims that a prima facie duties is a morally important aspect of an act that may be superseded by other similar aspects.
Prima facie is a Latin phrase that means "on the first appearance" or "based on the initial impression," according to popular usage. Depending on the circumstances, Ross defines a prima facie duties as one that is binding or obligatory.
Ross was a notable proponent of the moral plurality hypothesis or intuitionism. The theory contends there are moral truths that are self-evident and that good is unknowable.
Learn more about prima facie duties here:
brainly.com/question/28275044
#SPJ4
The briefcase is
"mislaid property".
Mislaid
property<span> is
any belonging of a person that was purposefully set around its proprietor and
after that they forgot about that. There is a difference between lost property
and mislaid property, for instance, a wallet that drops out of somebody's pocket
is lost but a wallet incidentally left on a table in an eatery is mislaid.</span>