How might taxes have an impact on your financial plan?

____writing uses storytelling to communicate to the reader.

iris [78.8K]

Answer: Narrative Writing

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

A marketing plan includes this marketing objective: "Create positive feelings about our brand." What is the main problem with th

Nesterboy [21]

c. It is not specific and measureable.

i hoped this helped

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Suppose that a worker in Caninia can produce either 2 blankets or 8 meals per day, and a worker in Felinia can produce either 5

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

15 blankets; 35 meals

Explanation:

First, we compute Opportunity Cost (OC).

In Caninia,

OC of blanket = 8/2 = 4 meals

OC of meals = 2/8 = 0.25 blanket

In Felinia,

OC of blanket = 1/5 = 0.2 meals

OC of meals = 5/1 = 5 blanket

Since Felinia can produce blankets at lower OC (0.2 < 4), so

Felinia has comparative advantage and specializing in blankets.

Total blankets produced with trade = 5 x 10

= 50

Since Caninia can produce meals at lower OC (0.25 < 5), so

Caninia has comparative advantage and specializing in meals.

Total meals produced with trade = 8 x 10

= 80

After trade,

Total blankets produced = 10 + 25

= 35

Decrease in blanket output = 50 - 35

= 15

Total meals produced = 40 + 5

= 45

Decrease in meals output = 80 - 45

= 35

5 0

3 years ago

how much of a stock's $30 price is reflected in pvgo if it expects to earn $4 per share, has an expected dividend of $2.50, and

Kruka [31]

The amount of the stock price that will be reflected in the PVGO is $10

The value of an organization's potential future growth is symbolized by the acronym PVGO, or "present value of growth opportunities." It represents the potential value for the organization by reinvesting its earnings back into the business.

Expected Dividend payment (D) = $2.50

Total Earnings (E) = $4

Rate of return (ROR) = 20%

Step 1. Using no growth rate (GR), computing the stock price (SP)

Since the growth rate is not specified, 0% is taken as the default value.

The stock price (SP) = E/ROR

= $4 / 20%

Stock price = $20.

Step 2. Computing the SP reflected in PVGO.

So, total SP with no GR

= $30 - $20

Stock price with no growth rate = $10

Hence, the $10 will be reflected in the PVGO

Learn more about PVGO:

brainly.com/question/28434542

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

Presented below is information related to Bobby Engram Company.

Natasha_Volkova [10]

Answer:

A. $ 98,210

B1. Cost to retail percentage 60%

B2. Cost to retail percentage 65.73 %

B3. Cost to retail percentage 58 %

B4. Cost to retail percentage 63.33 %

Explanation:

A. Computation for the ending inventory at retail

Inventory at Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 100,000

Purchase ( Net ) $ 200,000

Net Markup $ 10345

Less Net Markdown ($26,135)

Less Sales Revenue ($ 186,000)

Ending Inventory $ 98,210

Therefore the ending inventory at retail will be $ 98,210

B1) Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage

Excluding both markups and markdowns.

Cost to Retail Percentage

Excluding both Markup and Markdown

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 58,000 $ 100,000

Purchase (Net) $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Total $ 180,000 $ 300,000

Cost to retail percentage = $180,000/$300,000 Cost to retail percentage = 60%

B2. Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage Excluding Markups but Including Markdown

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 58,000 $ 100,000

Purchase (Net) $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Less Mark down ($ 26,135)

Total $ 180,000 $273,865

Cost to retail percentage= $180,000 /$ 273,865*100

Cost to retail percentage= 65.73 %

B3. Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage Excluding Markdowns but including Markups

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $ 58,000 $ 100,000

Purchase Net $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Add Net Markups $ 10,345

Total $180,000 $ 310,345

Cost to retail percentage = $180,000 / $ 310,345*100

Cost to retail percentage = 58 %

B4. Computation for a cost-to-retail percentage Including both Markups and Markdown

Cost Retail

Beginning Inventory $58,000 $100,000

Purchase Net $ 122,000 $ 200,000

Net Markups $ 10,345

Less Net Mardown ($26,135)

Total $ 180,000 $ 284,210

Cost to retail percentage = $ 180,000/ $ 284,210 × 100

Cost to retail percentage = 63.33 %

Therefore the cost-to-retail percentage are:

B1. Cost to retail percentage 60%

B2. Cost to retail percentage 65.73 %

B3. Cost to retail percentage 58 %

B4. Cost to retail percentage 63.33 %

8 0

2 years ago