Utilitarianism is a personal moral philosophy which id being used in this scenario.
<h3>What is Utilitarianism?</h3>
This is the morality that advocates actions that foster happiness or pleasure and maximizes wellbeing of individuals.
The manager believing that the benefits of a choice exceed the costs is ethicalk as result of her having more profit which will maximize the company' wellbeing.
Read more about Utilitarianism here brainly.com/question/2642866
Answer:
Title VII of the CRA
Explanation:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (CRA) is a landmark federal law that aims to protect employees against discrimination based on race, colour, sex, nation of origin, or religion.
The act was made law in 1964.
In the given scenario a female sales representative with excellent performance review was not promoted for 8 years, while Jim a male sales representative was promoted in just 18 months.
This is a gender based discrimination and is covered by Title VII of the CRA.
Age discrimination does not apply because it addresses discrimination of employees with minimum age of 40 years.
Equity act requires that employees on the same job role are compensated equally. This does not also apply.
Rehabilitation act prevents discrimination based on disability. This does not also apply
Answer:
1. $47,255
2. Dr Cost of goods sold account $1,316
Cr Inventory account $1,316
Explanation:
Please find attached detailed solution to the above questions and answers.
If the number of employed workers equals 200 million and the number of unemployed workers equals 20 million, the unemployment rate equals 9%.
<h3>What is the unemployment rate?</h3>
The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labour force that is unemployed.
The unemployment rate = (number of unemployed people / total labour force) x 100
Total labour force = 200 million + 20 million = 220 million
(20 / 220) x 100 = 9%
To learn more about unemployment, please check: brainly.com/question/10940465
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Accept the USA distributor demand. It is even better for Tetsu compared to Japan.
Explanation:
Considering both the distributors in Japan and the U.S. request a 20% margin for the retails of Tetsu's devices, accepting the offer of the U.S. company represents a good deal. Businesses are not handled the same in Japan and the U.S. Both countries have different policies. Tetsu must consider that the U.S. is a bigger market and that its devices are imported in the U.S., implying there could be tariffs imposed. Tough, if the U.S. distributor requests the same margin a Japanese distributor does to start businesses, <em>the deal will be in Tetsu's favor</em>.
