Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
Respuesta: Invade Polonia.
Explanation:
Hitler ordena a la Wehrmacht, el Ejército de Tierra del Tercer Reich, invadir a la República de Polonia en la madrugada del 1 de abril de 1.939, esa invasión generó reacciones por parte de Reino Unido y Francia, los cuales tenían acuerdos de defensa mutua con ese país de la Europa Oriental. A las primeras horas de la mañana de ese día, el Reino Unido y la República Francesa declararon la guerra al Tercer Reich, dando comienzo a la Segunda Guerra Mundial.
Answer:the experimental group is the group that the most factors change
Explanation:
Answer: Namibia Post and Telecommunications Holdings Limited
Please rate 5 stars and vote as brainliest
(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)(^o^)
"They provided too many opportunities for the Indonesians, who used their new skills to demand independence" is the way among the following choices given in the question that <span>the Dutch set themselves up for an uprising by the people of Indonesia. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". </span>