the correct answers are 1. ineffective; unanswerable, 2. ineffective; too broad, 3. ineffective; too narrow, 4. effective; clear and complex.
The correct answer among the choices provided is the fourth option. Personal testimony was used by the speaker to prove his point. The speaker talked about his experiences on how Britain tried to stop the war in Europe. He is credible since he was a Cabinet member during that time.
B. Personification
Because in personification you give human traits to objects
Answer:
The correct answer that shows that American Indians wanted to make peace with European colonists is B. "Being after some time of entertainment and gifts, dismissed, a while after he came again, and 5 more with him, and they brought again all the tools that were stolen away before, and made way for the coming of their great Sachem, called Massasoyt; who, about 4 or 5 days after, came with the chief of his friends and other attendance, with the aforesaid Squanto."
Explanation:
The said excerpt shows that American Indians were trying to make peace with the Europeans because first of all they brough gifts and returned the tools that had been stolen. Moreover, they even brought their Sachem, a paramount chief and returned later with more chiefs. Both actions seem like a reparation of things being stolen in order to soothe the relationship and then bringing their chiefs as a sign of respect to negotiate peace with the colonists.
It is TRUE to state that even in paraphrased work the reader should be able to identify where the paraphrase begins and end.
<h3>What is a paraphrase?</h3>
A paraphrase is a restatement of a text's or passage's meaning using another language. The name itself is taken from the Ancient Greek 'additional mode of expressing' via Latin paraphrasis. Paraphrasing is also known as paraphrasis.
The act of paraphrasing demonstrates that you comprehend the source sufficiently to express it in your own words. It also provides a strong alternative to utilizing direct quotations, which ought to be used sparingly.
The difference between Summary and Paraphrasing is given as follows:
- The main idea of the entire source is briefly and clearly expressed in an abstract form, but the paraphrase repeats the idea of the source in detail.
- Because a paraphrase contains all of the author's main ideas, it is usually as long as the original source, sometimes longer. However, summaries are always shorter.
- Paraphrasing is most useful when you want to present or explore an author's ideas but don't think the original words are worth quoting directly. Paraphrasing is great because it helps you control the temptation to quote too much from the source.
Learn more about paraphrasing:
brainly.com/question/24729251
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Even in paraphrased work the reader should be able to identify where the paraphrase begins and end.
Is the above statement TRUE or FALSE?
