Answer:
Because it takes a long time for the predictable outcome to occur
Explanation:
This is a line from melo-drama called "Hamlet Dull Revenge" authored by Rene Girard.
The play examines the character called Hamlet who despite wanting to avenge his father, who was unjustly killed by Claudius, took his time to investigate the circumstances involved instead of engaging his mindless and wanton killings because of his desire for vengeance.
The author Girard, concludes that Hamlets tact is delaying vengeance is not a sign of weakness as vengeance is often a response to violence or injury to a loved person.
B. Highlights of the Nebraska Museum of Art
Explanation: the other options focus on aspects that does not focus on the art displayed in the museum. A talks about physical sites, not the actual art. C talks about the importance of art which is a general title that does not specify the needed topic (it is also not a basis of informing— this is usually opinionized) while D talks about the instructional basis of artists learning paint: not the art displayed itself.
Answer:
Frisby and the Rats of NIMH is Man (non-human protagonist ) vs. Nature. When Mrs. Frisby's son Timothy comes down with pneumonia, she faces a serious choice: try to escape to the woods to avoid plowing, or stay in hopes that their home will be missed by the plow.
Explanation:
Sorry its late :l
Answer:
a type of harmful witch who has the ability to possess or disguise themselves as animals
Answer:
First, one has to be clear about what we are talking about. In a pure democracy, the people simply decide together what they are going to do. The rule of law matters a little but not terribly much in that situation since if there are any disagreements about what we all agreed to, we simply get back together and decide again. In practice, of course, a pure democracy does not work for anything more than a very small group.
What we generally mean is a representative democracy, or a republic. This means that there are certain people elevated to positions of authority and decision-making for society (temporarily) based on democratic selection. What makes their power temporary? What ensures that they only exercise the power they are supposed to? What prevents any of these people from becoming dictators? We may want to say that they only have the powers that we grant them democratically but ultimately those individuals in power are the ones that control the process. Democracy at a large scale, even with respect to just elections, only works if there are established procedures that are strictly followed. The principle of the rule of law means that at the most basic level we all agree that the laws as written down are what “rule” everything and everybody. Nobody can change that fact. So if some individual chooses to say they have some god-like authority, our society as a whole will not follow them because we all agree the Constitution supersedes their opinion about any authority they believe they should have. It is a fundamental social contract that we all share that makes our laws work and makes it theoretically impossible for somebody to become a dictator. Without this implicit social contract, the Constitution and the laws mean nothing.
NOTE: We tend to associate other ideas like “equality before the law”, “civil rights”, and other ideals with the rule of law. While the rule of law can help enable these things, they are not the same thing nor are they specifically part of the rule of law. The rule of law can allow and even enable inequality before the law (as it did in the Roman Empire) and a variety of other things we consider wrong. In fact the rule of law does not even have anything to do with democracy at all. It is simply a principle that allows a stable, functioning society by establishing that we all have to live by the agreed-upon standards. But as stated, a representative democracy cannot function without it.
Explanation:
