Answer:
Explanation:
Liability of Petri:
On all the purchases, if payment is made within 30days from delivery, Petri gave the authority of a 5% discount to Adam. Upon extension of credit to customers, no terms were given to Adam.
In the case under consideration, Adam explicitly gave a false representation of his authority to get more sales on his account and thus, Petri is NOT accountable to John on his terms with Adam.
Liability of John:
Being a customer to Petri, John has to discover the detailed terms on discount and other payment terms with Petri when he called Petri. John is also accountable to make clarifications whether Adam has the authority to give a 10% discount and making payment in three installments.
In the case under consideration, John has failed to find the exact details on whether Adam has the authority to give a 10% discount. Thus, he is accountable to make the payment of $9500 in 30days.
The most logical answer is D
Answer:
$13,532
.00
Explanation:
The cost allocation is usually based on a measurable factor such as area occupied, number of students etc. The more the measurable factor related to a unit/department, the more the cost assigned to the departments on the basis of the size of the measurable value.
Total number of employees
= 640
the amount of cost allocated to Department B under the direct method would be
= 199/640 * $43,520
= $13,532
Yes he should be because people had higher expectations
