Answer:
Nathan's contention is wrong.
Explanation:
Storage of money at home involves the opportunity cost of losing out on income that would've been generated had the same money been invested elsewhere or deposited with a bank.
Secondly, money stored at home is vulnerable to theft and other forms of risks.
Thirdly, stored money at home does not contribute to any economic benefit since such money is out of circular flow of money in the economy. So it yields no return.
Thus, Nathan's contention of stored money at home being costless is wrong.
<span>Radio Act of 1927
The FCC still uses this standard as part of its consideration when issuing broadcast licenses.</span>
Not positive, but I would put "influencer" because he is helping with a decision.
Answer:
Hutters can be claim two dependents
Explanation:
we know here that Hutters can be claim two dependents
because here given Carla and Ellie as Aaron meets neither the residency nor citizenship requirement
but Carla is a qualifying relative and is under the age of 24
but Ellie is above 24 but is a qualifying relative as scholarship is non-taxable
so
we can say that answer is two
Answer:
In the case of age 30, there will be more money at the age of 60
Explanation:
When person start investing at the age of 20 then total year till 60 years age is = 40 years.
Interest rate (r ) = 7 percent or 0.07.
Investment amount (Present value) = $1000
Now the total amount at the age of 60 years is calculated below.
Now calculate the total amount at the age of 60 years when he invest at the age of 30 and earns interest rate 10 percent. Now the number of years is 30.
