Answer:
The selected option
Step-by-step explanation:
Coincidentally, you answered correctly.
From the values of 3 and five, we can assume that the function of the table is Y=x+2.
But if we move to the next value pairs, that function is false.
10=6+2 that isn't correct.
If you apply this to all the pairs in the table you will find that there is not a function that represents the values given. Therefore, the first option is correct.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(103,581) • (%110)
= (103,581) • (1.10)
= $113,939.1
Answer:
The question is not so clear and complete
Step-by-step explanation:
But for questions like this, since the equation has been given, what is expected is for us to make comparison, compare the RHS with the LHS or by method of comparing coefficients.
We follow the stated conditions since we are told that b and c are both integers which are greater than 1 and b is less than the product of cb. from these conditions, we can compare and get the values of b , c and d.
Another approach is to assume values, make assumptions with the stated conditions, however, our assumptions must be valid and correct if we substitute the assumed values of b, c and d in the equation, it must arrive at the same answer for the RHS. i.e LHS = RHS
Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
Put -1 where x is in each expression and evaluate it.
__
You will find that the expression is zero when the numerator is zero. And you will find the numerator is zero when it has a factor that is equivalent to ...
(x +1)
Substituting x=-1 into this factor makes it be ...
(-1 +1) = 0
__
Evaluating the first expression, we have ...
This first expression is one you want to "check."
You can see that the reason the expression is zero is that x+1 has a sum of zero. You can look for that same sum in the other expressions. (The tricky one is the one with the factor (x -(-1)). You know, of course, that -(-1) = +1.)
Answer:
x - 4 = 2y
Step-by-step explanation:
"four less than a number x" therefore; x - 4
"is twice another number y" therefore; 2y
