Answer:
Explanation:
Social structure <u>in both</u><em> Latin America before the wars for Independence and France before the French revolution</em> was <em>characterized by rich ruling minority and poor subjugated majority</em>. The Catholic Church represented by the Clergy occupied the top position in both Latin America, followed by nobles in France and Peninsulars in Latin America. The poor minority in these regions was heavily taxed and mistreated which lead to revolting against the ruling higher classes.
Meanwhile, the <u>key difference</u> between social structures in Latin America and France was laying in the fact that <u>in Latin America it was heavily marked by ethnicity</u>, while <u>in France it was not</u>.
For example, in major parts of Latin America, Peninsulars were the pure-blood noble Spaniards that came from Spain to rule over Spanish colonies (corresponding to French nobles). On the bottom of Latin American social structure were Mulatto (mix of white an black blood), Mestizos (mix of white and Indigenous American blood) and ultimately African slaves.
The answer for this question is C. The Domino Theory. This theory states that if a country came under communist rule, its neighboring countries and regions would follow as well. This theory is what the US used as a reason to intervene in the different affairs of various countries to stop or prevent communism from spreading.
I'm not lonely, but I'm fine with companionship
Answer:
The answer is - A. This policy can make coordination with headquarters problematic
Explanation:
The polycentric policy is an approach to international management which has to do with the hiring and promotion of employees who are citizens or nationals of the host country that operates the company. The employees who are citizens of the host country take on managerial positions in order to execute operations in the subsidiary company. This approach is also used to maintain low hiring cost as employing foreigners could cost more. However, this policy has some disadvantages, one of which is that it can make coordination with the headquarters problematic.
The <span> governor would be the answer</span>
