Answer:
Pretend that three people who weigh the same take turns on a seesaw. No matter which two people are on the seesaw at opposite ends, they are balanced. Our government is the same way. The three that take turns riding the seesaw are:
Congress - Legislative Branch
President - Executive Branch
Supreme Court - Judicial Branch
How do these branches balance and check each other? Each branch has different powers from another branch. But each weighs the same.
President:
Makes treaties with other nations
Carries out laws
Vetoes bills Congress passes if he thinks they are wrong
Appoints judges in the Judicial Branch for a life term
Writes the budget
Congress:
Makes laws
Can override a President's veto of a bill by 2/3 vote
Can impeach a President for misconduct
Must approve presidential appointments for judges and justices
Gives the O.K. on budget spending and treaties
Can remove judges from office for misconduct
Supreme Court:
Interprets laws
May decide that some laws that Congress makes or decisions that the President make are not right according to the Constitution.
Local governments in the United States use zoning to regulate land uses in specific areas
Answer:
Conventional reasoning (Loyalty to law and order)
Explanation:
Kohlberg did some studies on morality and proposed a theory on moral development.
Kohlberg defined three different levels of morality (and each level consists in 2 stages).
These levels are
In the preconventional level, the person's morality is externally controlled and therefore acts based on what the punishment will be (1st stage) or based on how good will it be for him/her to act in some way (2nd stage)
The conventional level stages also has to do with external controls but now the person thinks in function of ensure positive relationships and societal order. The third stage here depends on the approval of others. The fourth stage has to do with accepting rules because they preserve the society order and functioning.
The postconventional level stages are defined in more abstract principles or values. The 5th stage sees the world as a place with different values that must be respected. Finally the 6th stage is based in universal ethical abstract principles.
Heinz dilemma states that Heinz wife is dying and that there is a drug that can save her but it's very expensive and Heinz doesn't have the money to get it. Then the question of the dilemma is "Should Heinz steal the drug?"
In the example, Kareem says he shouldn't because he would be sent to jail, according to Kohlberg theory, we can see that <u>Kareem is answering based on external factors, in particular with accepting rules because they preserve the society order and functioning </u>(You should not steal because the rules say so),
Thus he is using a conventional moral reasoning, specifically in the fourth stage known as "Loyalty to law and order".
Agoraphobia
Agoraphobia is a type of anxiety
disorder in which people fear and avoid places or situations that might cause
them to panic and make them feel helpless or embarrassed. Most people who have
agoraphobia develop it after having one or more panic attacks, causing them to
worry about having another attack and avoid the places where it may happen
again. The symptoms of agoraphobia include fear of using public transportation,
fear of crowds and the fear of leaving home alone. For the question given
above, Carrie seems to be displaying symptoms of agoraphobia.
The economic way of thinking is c. a biased perspective, but the existence of bias does not mean the discipline should be condemned.
<h3>What can be said of the economic way of thinking?</h3>
The economic way of thinking is biased based on the school of economics that a person subscribes to such as Keynesian or New Classical.
This does not mean that we should condemn the discipline however because it still provides valuable insights on how to allocate resources.
Find out more on the economic way of thinking at brainly.com/question/10938886
#SPJ1
