Answer:
The President has used his role as commander-in-chief to initiate military actions, but not war.
Explanation:
The difference between a military action or intervention and war is diffuse and subject of debate among constitutional scholars. It seems that if the president sends military abroad without approval of Congress, then, it is a military intervention, and if the president does the same with approval of Congress (as it happened in World War II, the last time Congress declared war), then, it is war.
Therefore, the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and most recently, Libya and Syria interventions are not legally considered war, but military interventions.
"Guns" were not an African good traded in exchange for European goods, since Africa did not have the factories need to assemble the guns, which were instead made in Europe.
He thought to help the people and give them aid. He did this through his "New Deal" which setup programs to help the country and its people. It helped create jobs, ensure them, and help the unemployed.
<span>I believe that the answer to the question provided above isthat he inspired the </span>rebels<span> in 1776 to declare independence from Britain and</span><span> his ideas reflected Enlightenment-era rhetoric of transnational human rights.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
</span>
