1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
15

How did European motivations for expansion compare to those of the Roman Empire, the Arab world under Islam, or the Mongols in C

entral Asia?
History
1 answer:
pashok25 [27]3 years ago
7 0
The expansion of the European nations were mixed of the three empires stated above: God and religion like the Arabs, glory like the Romans and stability and wealth like the Mongols. First is that the European nations expands for gaining new converts for Christianity. Next is like the Romans, the European nations seek adventures and fame for their names and the country they served. Lastly, like the Mongols who in search of wealth and stability for their tribes, Europeans were in search of the wealth and resources that was lost after the fall of the Christian kingdoms like the crusader kingdoms and old trading partners in the Middle East.
You might be interested in
When did Thomas saint Created sewing machine?
sertanlavr [38]
Thomas saint created the sewing machine in 1790
4 0
2 years ago
Which of these statements BEST describes "Jacksonian Democracy"?
Shalnov [3]
Well that would be a democracy run by Jackson. Correct? And I think that would cause an imbalance in power.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the leader of the Britanies?
Vlad [161]

Answer:

Brittany Alexandra Leader,

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is one example of a political party
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

Examples of dominant party systems include the People's Action Party in Singapore, the African National Congress in South Africa, the Cambodian People's Party in Cambodia, the Liberal Democratic Party in Japan, and the National Liberation Front in Algeria.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should the United States Have Annexed the Philippines?
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

The U.S. should have annexed the Philippines because it would’ve given us a larger sphere of power and influence. However, you could argue this larger sphere of power is bad because this is what got the Spanish in the conflict in the first place, the more land they occupied, the more revolutions from the people, and the annexation of the Philippines did in fact cause a revolt and a more deadly one, 4,200 Americans and over 20,000 Filipino soldiers were killed, and 200,000 Filipinos civilians were killed from famine, disease, and violence.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The colonies were divided into regions. name each region and list the colonies
    6·1 answer
  • Help!!
    13·1 answer
  • Which leader was a member of the Communist Party yet made the most changes against Communism when he took office?
    13·2 answers
  • a historian who compares the expansion of political systems to the expansion of economic systems is organizing history by ____
    9·1 answer
  • Which early European settlement is marked by the star on the map?
    14·1 answer
  • Please Help!!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP........................Which language was developed by slaves and former slaves in south Carolinaa.Creole b.Pennsylv
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    12·1 answer
  • Enchance community quarantine sang ayon at Di sang ayon​
    13·1 answer
  • What was done about the stock market crash in the 1920<br> can you help me
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!