1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
8

Reasons for not going to war in 1861

History
1 answer:
attashe74 [19]3 years ago
4 0
Real reasons for the Civil War:
This is well-reasoned document concerning the reasons the Civil War occurred.

Many people think the Civil War of 1860-1865 was fought over one issue alone, slavery. Nothing could actually be further from the truth. The War Between the States began because the South demanded States' rights and were not getting them.

The Congress at that time heavily favored the industrialized northern states to the point of demanding that the South sell is cotton and other raw materials only to the factories in the north, rather than to other countries. The Congress also taxed the finished materials that the northern industries produced heavily, making finished products that the South wanted, unaffordable. The Civil War should not have occurred. If the Northern States and their representatives in Congress had only listened to the problems of the South, and stopped these practices that were almost like the taxation without representation of Great Britain, then the Southern states would not have seceded and the war would not have occurred.

I know for many years, we have been taught that the Civil War was all about the abolition of slavery, but this truly did not become a major issue, with the exception of John Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry, until after the Battle of Antietam in September 1862, when Abraham Lincoln decided to free the slaves in the Confederate States in order to punish those states for continuing the war effort. The war had been in progress for two years by that time.

Most southerners did not even own slaves nor did they own plantations. Most of them were small farmers who worked their farms with their families. They were fighting for their rights. They were fighting to maintain their lifestyle and their independence the way they wanted to without the United States Government dictating to them how they should behave.

Why are we frequently taught then, that the Civil War, War of Northern Aggression, War Between the States, or whatever you want to call it, was solely about slavery? That is because the history books are usually written by the winners of a war and this war was won by the Union. However, after following my family around since I was just a year old to Civil War Living History scenarios in Gettysburg and elsewhere, I have listened to both sides of the story, from those portraying historical figures, both Union and Confederate. Through listening to these people and also reading many different books, including some of the volumes of The Official Records of the Civil War, Death in September, The Insanity of It All, Every Day Life During the Civil War, and many others, I have come to the conclusion that the Civil War was about much more than abolishing the institution of slavery.

It was more about preserving the United States and protecting the rights of the individual, the very tenets upon which this country was founded. I personally think that the people who profess that the Civil War was only fought about slavery have not read their history books. I really am glad that slavery was abolished, but I don't think it should be glorified as being the sole reason the Civil War was fought. There are so many more issues that people were intensely passionate about at the time. Slavery was one of them, but it was not the primary cause of the war. The primary causes of the war were economics and states' rights.

Slavery was a part of those greater issues, but it was not the reason the Southern States seceded from the Union, nor fought the Civil War. It certainly was a Southern institution that was part of the economic system of the plantations, and because of that, it was part and parcel of the economic reasons that the South formed the Confederacy. The economic issue was one of taxation and being able to sell cotton and other raw materials where the producers wanted to, rather than where they were forced to, and at under inflated prices. Funny, it sounds very much like the reason we broke from Great Britain to begin with. The South was within their rights, but there should have been another way to solve the problem. If they had been willing to listen to Abraham Lincoln, perhaps the war could have been avoided. Lincoln had a plan to gradually free the slaves without it further hurting the plantation owners. He also had a plan to allow them to sell their products anywhere they wanted to and at a fair price. They did not choose to listen to the President, however, so they formed the Confederacy and the Civil War began.
You might be interested in
Can someone plz help me? :(
solniwko [45]
B there army’s conquered lots of territory. :)
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
7. Man who took over as president when Lincoln was assassinated was who?
LenKa [72]

Answer:

Andrew Johnson

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the long term industrialization allowed countries to be able to
In-s [12.5K]
Creation of power machine and factories provided many new jobs, increased production, gave ppl ability to transport raw materials. It led to urbanization. Urbanization, which is the movement of ppl into cities and buildings. People wanted to live closer to where they worked. The western workd went from rural and agricultural to urban industrial. HOPE THIS HELPS YOU

6 0
2 years ago
How did the British succeed on taking Quebec?
jenyasd209 [6]
The British had twice as many trained troops as a French had.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
if the columbian exchange had not occurred, would we be able to eat the foods we currently eat? explain
Harrizon [31]
No, the Colombian exchange brought new food to the Americas such as cattle, pigs, and wheat (in exchange for foods such as tomatoes, squash, and beans).
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the union war strategy take advantage of southern weakness to achieve a victory
    7·2 answers
  • WILL VOTE BRAINLIEST!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Which Greek scientist contributed to the field of mathematics?
    5·2 answers
  • Which conditions explain why there were so many working poor in the Industrial Age?
    7·2 answers
  • There comes a time when people get tired of being trampled over by the iron feet of oppression.... I want it to be known that
    8·2 answers
  • 1. Which trading bloc is NOT made<br><br> primarily of Latin American<br><br> nations?
    7·1 answer
  • • Imagine you are a colonial soldier. How do you think your opinion of Europeans
    9·1 answer
  • APPLYING MAIN IDEAS Who was the commander of the Allied forces in Europe? a. Douglas MacArthur C. Dwight D. Eisenhower b. George
    13·1 answer
  • “In December 598 [B.C.] Nebuchadnezzar left Babylon once more to campaign in the west. He besieged Jerusalem, which had rebelled
    15·2 answers
  • tanging ang diyos lamang ang nakakaalam ng pinaka mabuti para sa atin anong hakbang ng normal na pagpapasa ito​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!