Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Many constitutional monarchies started out as, would be: Absolute monarchies.
Explanation:
The big difference between an absolute monarchy and a constitutional monarchy, is the limitations placed on the power exercised by a monarch, or head ruler, of a country. In ancient times, this became the norm, especially in Europe, where the absolute power of kings was unquestioned and unchecked by anyone. However, even if kingdoms all over the world started out as absolute monarchies, with the King or Queen being the only law in the land, this changed through time, until these rulers became bound by another law; that of a constitution. This is the case of England, and other such nations, where government went from being solely in the hands of a ruler, to the ruler´s power being chained by constitutions. Today, many of the monarchies only have Kings and Queens as symbols, but they play no part in government.
Answer:
medical history of individuals
Answer:
<h2>Open the link to see answer </h2>
Explanation:
https://brainly.in/question/16939434
<h2>I'm glad to help you </h2>
Hi. I was only able to find three legal wrongs. Hope this helps. The three legal wrongs are tort, civil, breach of contract. A legal wrong is either a violation of a person's right or the failure to perform a duty. Torts are legal or civil wrong that is committed that causes a loss. Civil is a legal wrong that causes of action under the government law. Breach of contract is a legal wrong when someone does not follow or does not honor the contract.
