Answer: b) this is a private law issue regarding contract law
Explanation: Private law is the law and regulation that is present individuals and has no relation with the government. Contract law states about the law that contains the agreement rules and regulations for binding individual through it.
The situation mentioned in the question about Kate and Micheal states about the problem of private law that is related with contract law. In their situation the private law was made for selling the house of Kate to Micheal.But Kate is refusing to perform transaction process which is raising the issue in the contract law. As per the contract agreement Kate should sell the house to Micheal and by denying to do so , she is creating the issue.
Other options are incorrect because it does not consider government rules so it cannot be a public law.It cannot be substantive law as civil society's regulation and rules are not required in given situation
Criminal law is not related with the situation as crime activity is not involved and tort law is not defined as civil laws are not broken .Thus, the correct option is option(b).
Like, things they didn't have? I think slaves is one of them...
Answer:
hi bestie
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Mississippi River allowed quick transportation.
Answer: a bridge of contract
Explanation:
A bridge of contract from the state government. Am I sure the state government before leasing out the land must have asked the company what they wanted to use the land for and for how many duration. It is obvious that duration of the agreement , I.e the duration by which the land was leased was not stated from the passage above but to draw conclusion ,the company will most likely charge the state government based on a bridge of contract agreement as they must have told the state government what they wanted to build and there must have been terms . am alsonsure that if the company actually knew that the government was going to build a bridge on that land in the coming few years, they wouldn't have invested so much in the land . so it a bridge of contract agreement.
